![]() |
08:41 AM CDT on Sunday, August 21, 2005
Editor's Note: This story first appeared in The Dallas Morning
News on May 20, 1986.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Monday granted a stay of
execution for a Dallas man scheduled to die by lethal injection
Wednesday after his attorneys argued he was denied a fair trial because
blacks were prevented from serving on his jury.
03/09/1986: Race bias pervades jury selection 03/10/1986: Black youth's trial illustrates imbalance 03/11/1986: Judge plans to urge action to end jury selection bias 05/20/1986: Dallas man gets stay of execution
Larry Smith, 30, who is black, was convicted by an all-white jury of
capital murder for the Feb. 2, 1978, robbery-murder of a Dallas
convenience store clerk.
A prosecution witness testified that the victim, Michael Dean Mason, was
shot by Smith when he couldn't open the store's safe.
Attorneys for Smith said Monday that the stay could result in a court
hearing to determine whether prosecutors used peremptory strikes --
legal objections that allow lawyers to dismiss prospective jurors
without explanation -- to systematically exclude blacks from the jury.
Defense lawyer Mike Barclay of Alpine and Dallas defense lawyer Wayne
Huff asked for a stay of execution May 13 before state District Judge
Jack Hampton. Hampton presided over Smith's 1982 trial in Dallas.
Hampton denied the motion, which was then appealed to the criminal
appeals court. If the Austin court rules that an evidentiary hearing
should be held, it will be conducted in Hampton's court. At that time,
Smith's attorneys would have the opportunity to present evidence
supporting their claim.
Barclay said his decision to file the motion followed an April 30 U.S.
Supreme Court ruling that prosecutors cannot exclude potential jurors
because they are the same race as a defendant. Barclay said his decision
to appeal the execution also was influenced by a series in The Dallas
Morning News, which showed Dallas County prosecutors routinely excluded
almost nine out of 10 blacks qualified to serve as jurors.
In Batson vs. Kentucky, the Supreme Court overturned a 21-year-old
opinion -- Swain vs. Alabama -- that allowed prosecutors using
peremptory strikes to exclude qualified blacks from juries without
explanation.
The News analysis published in March was based on 100 randomly
selected cases in Dallas County in 1983 and 1984. The analysis revealed
that a qualified black had a 1-in-10 chance of serving on a jury , but
whites had a 1-in-2 chance.
In Smith's trial, peremptory strikes by the prosecution resulted in the
all-white jury , Barclay said.
"There were blacks on the panel," he said. "But no blacks on the jury ."
Huff said he is waiting to see if the criminal appeals court will use
Smith's case as an opportunity to align itself with the Supreme Court's
Batson ruling. Previously, he said, the Texas court's rulings were
always governed by the Swain case.
Smith also was scheduled to die Aug. 13, 1985. His attorneys asked for a
stay, alleging that he had been denied a fair trial because individuals
who had reservations about the death penalty were not considered as
jurors. The criminal appeals court later denied the stay and the
execution date for Wednesday was set.
Most blacks trust selection system, survey finds
Picking juries is an inexact science, lawyers say
Jury selection biased throughout Texas
Some states act to reduce jury-selection bias




